[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Re: re-keying]

To: <jpickering@phase2net.com>, <ipsec@tis.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: re-keying]
From: "Nishant Dani" <nishant@frontiertech.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 1998 14:51:14 -0400
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Is this a problem only with Phase 1 initiation?  Even if we have both ends
initiating a simultaneous
rekeying, we may end up with an exact situation regarding the Quick Mode SA
deletion on both the ends.  And then
both ends are stuck.  I would think that there is more probability of the
occurance of a QM deadlock rather than
a Phase 1 deadlock, because firstly QM timeouts may be more frequent.

So what does one do in such a case - how to detect unambigously the presence
of a deadlock, and then how to proceed.

Nishant
Frontier Technologies Corp.


1.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Pickering <jpickering@phase2net.com>
To: ipsec@tis.com <ipsec@tis.com>
Date: Wednesday, October 14, 1998 11:02 AM
Subject: [Fwd: Re: re-keying]


>Any ideas on attached from anyone?
>
>jeff
>

Prev by Date: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-spsl-00.txt
Next by Date: RE: [Fwd: Re: re-keying]
Prev by thread: [Fwd: Re: re-keying]
Next by thread: RE: [Fwd: Re: re-keying]
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread