[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Selection of proposals
> I'm a bit confused by your example.
>
> endpoints. Also, we do not require support for the specific example you
> cited, because you have two nested tunnels with a common endpoint. This is
> not a required combination according to the arch doc, a simplification made
> at the request of other implementors last year.
>
In Sec4.3 Combining Security Associations(page 12) describes
how we can bundle SAs.
1)Transport adjacency
2)Iterated tunneling
And this example matches case2 (in Page 13). so now can I
say that this is a valid cinfiguration with reference to
draft.
otherwise, what's wrong with that configuration. Can we
know why the implementors requested it that way?
-thanks
-ramana
Follow-Ups:
References: