[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPSECond

To: DEWAYNE STONE <Stone.Dewayne@bei.bls.com>
Subject: Re: IPSECond
From: Shawn_Mamros@BayNetworks.COM (Shawn Mamros)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 11:03:59 -0500
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

>     How do IPSECond and IPSec compare?  Are they the same or is IPSECond 
>     intended to run parallel with IPSec?

"IPSecond" is a word that was coined as a catch-all for the follow-on
work that the IPSEC working group is now taking on.  Despite what some
misinformed folks (or folks who seek to deliberately mislead others)
say, it is *NOT* a "complete rewrite" of IPSEC.  All of the "IPSecond"
work is based on IPSEC (and IKE) as its core.

-Shawn Mamros
E-mail to: Shawn_Mamros@BayNetworks.com

Prev by Date: RE: FW: IPSec Monitoring MIB works for IPv4 only?
Next by Date: Re: IPSECond
Prev by thread: IPSECond
Next by thread: Re: IPSECond
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread