[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: FW: IPSec Monitoring MIB works for IPv4 only?

To: John Shriver <jas@shiva.com>
Subject: Re: FW: IPSec Monitoring MIB works for IPv4 only?
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 20:31:41 -0500
cc: tjenkins@TimeStep.com, ipsec@tis.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 18 Nov 1998 10:26:38 EST." <199811181526.KAA02345@brill.shiva.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com


  I'd have to agree with John's comments about the indexing.
  It makes sense to me. I have built indexes like this in the past
for policy lookups, and isn't a big deal.

]     Internet Security. Have encryption, will travel           |1 Fish/2 Fish[
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |Red F./Blow F[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |strong crypto[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

References:

Re: FW: IPSec Monitoring MIB works for IPv4 only?

From: John Shriver <jas@shiva.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-req-01.txt
Next by Date: Fwd: Re: Comments on draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-req-01.txt
Next by thread: marketing misuse of IPSECond efforts
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread