[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

No Subject

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


  Recently, 

>>>>> "Jon" == Jon McCown <jmccown@icsa.net> wrote:
    Jon> RED Node/Red Net - A red network is (most simply) a private
    Jon> network which has an IPSEC gateway connecting it to another
    Jon> network.  Red nodes are non-IPSEC hosts which are connected

  Alas, I wrote:

   red interface
      is the interface that is exposed to the Internet
   black interface
      is the interface that is connected only to the internal network

  I'd like to do a straw poll. I'd like to come up with a clear,
simple set of terms for things. "Public network" and "private network"
are pretty clear. Should we lose the "red" "black", and go for just
"public" and "private", or should one even discard that and use
"encrypted" and "clear"??

]     Internet Security. Have encryption, will travel           |1 Fish/2 Fish[
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |Red F./Blow F[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |strong crypto[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQBVAwUBNlTteR4XQavxnHg9AQF4TwH+JtZVdWNa7ZABjV3xdzY5WLddKnwXODWD
EciDG1h+fKLZlCGHX48DYyxhtP4KVAD/0ulAg6HXE2yFk4YYxbEVgA==
=Ot6S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Follow-Ups: