[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
No Subject
[132.245.135.83])
by mailhost.corpeast.BayNetworks.COM (SMI-8.6/BNET-97/05/05-S) with SMTP
id OAA03536; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 14:10:23 -0500
for
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19981217141018.00812820@bl-mail2.corpeast.baynetworks.com>
X-Sender: thardjon@bl-mail2.corpeast.baynetworks.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 14:10:18 -0500
To: "Hilarie K. Orman" <ho@earth.hpc.org>
From: Thomas_Hardjono@BayNetworks.COM (Thomas Hardjono)
Subject: Re: Anycast
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199812170244.SAA17406@earth.hpc.org>
References: <Yourmessage <199812162233.OAA27474@kebe.eng.sun.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-ipsec@portal.ex.tis.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi,
I tend to agree with Hilarie. Its not such a HARD/hard problem.
Just to put a plug on the work we are doing:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipsec-intragkm-00.txt
Slides on this topic from the Orlando-IETF should be available soon on:
http://www.ipmulticast.com/community/smug/
At 06:44 PM 12/16/98 -0800, Hilarie K. Orman wrote:
>
>Initial multicast key distribution might be heavyweight, it might
>be cumbersome, but it's not HARD or even hard.
>
>Hilarie
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas Hardjono 3 Federal Street, BL3-03
Bay Architecture Lab Billerica, MA 01821, USA
Nortel Networks Tel: 978-916-4538
email: thardjono@baynetworks.com Fax: 978-916-0620
----------------------------------------------------------------------