[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: transport-friendly ESP
- To: kent@bbn.com
- Subject: Re: transport-friendly ESP
- From: Tony Li <tli@juniper.net>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 06:44:40 GMT
- CC: Alten@home.com, smb@research.att.com, ipsec@tis.com, end2end-interest@isi.edu, tsv@ee.lbl.gov, diff-serv@BayNetworks.COM, ecn-interest@research.att.com, red-impl@lbl.gov, jis@MIT.EDU, mleech@nortel.ca
- In-reply-to: <v0401170cb2d7d08a8fd5@[128.33.238.173]> (message from StephenKent on Fri, 29 Jan 1999 15:55:41 -0500)
- Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com
Please, please, please, please...
Take this thread off of every list except end2end-interest.
Thanks,
Tony
| The purpose of IPsec is to offer end-to-end protection, so applying IPsec
| on a per-hop basis is feasible, but findamentally counter to the underlying
| motivation for these protocols, since the begining of this work (too) many
| years ago.