[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IKE Keep-alives

To: ipsec@tis.com
Subject: Re: IKE Keep-alives
From: Joern Sierwald <joern.sierwald@datafellows.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 09:12:35 +0200
In-Reply-To: <A0550295565ED211A13B00A0C9A7918906A2F5@mail.altiga.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

At 17:12 17.2.1999 -0500, you wrote:
>All:
>
>We are currently using a proprietary IKE keep-alive mechanism between our
>IPSec client software and our IPSec concentrator.  We use the keep-alives to
>alert the concentrator if a modem connection has dropped or if the Internet
>link has gone down so that we can clean up the appropriate remote access SAs
>quickly.
>
>My question is: Is there a more standard way of doing this?  I could not
>find anything applicable in any of the RFCs.
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>Victor
>

What are you keeping alive? ISAKMP or IPsec SAs?

If it's ISAKMP, just write a draft. I'd like an interoperable solution.

Jörn

References:

IKE Keep-alives

From: "Volpe, Victor" <vvolpe@altiga.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Last Call: Mobility Support in IPv6 to Proposed Standard
Next by Date: Handling of Life Two life times
Prev by thread: IKE Keep-alives
Next by thread: RE: Last Call: Mobility Support in IPv6 to Proposed Standard
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread