[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bridging non-IP traffic over IPSec

To: ebomarsi@xedia.com (Eric Bomarsi)
Subject: Re: Bridging non-IP traffic over IPSec
From: Dan McDonald <danmcd@Eng.Sun.Com>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 13:43:39 -0800 (PST)
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <36CC7BB0.D2D633E0@xedia.com> from "Eric Bomarsi" at Feb 18, 99 03:44:32 pm
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

> Is GRE tunnelling the proposed standard method of bridging
> non-IP traffic over IPSec tunnels? If so, where is this stated?

I don't know if this is a proposed _standard_ for doing this, but I don't see
why IPsec can't protect GRE-encapsulated traffic.  After all, GRE is just
another IP protocol (47), why can't it be protected.

Dan

References:

Bridging non-IP traffic over IPSec

From: Eric Bomarsi <ebomarsi@xedia.com>

Prev by Date: Bridging non-IP traffic over IPSec
Next by Date: RE: Last Call: Mobility Support in IPv6 to Proposed Standard
Prev by thread: Bridging non-IP traffic over IPSec
Next by thread: Re: Bridging non-IP traffic over IPSec
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread