[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: representation of IKE DH shared secret
Efforts are made, by several parties, to document what was found at the
meetings on the list, in the style of an "ietf working group meeting outside
of normal ietf meetings". This intent has probably been imperfectly
implemented.
So when you come to the next workshop, maybe we'll all ask you to be
scribe this time ;-)
Seriously, though, we've tried to do this.
At 09:02 AM 4/23/99 -0400, Dave Clark wrote:
>For those of us who are unable to attend the meetings, are these types
>of resolutions announced in some fashion? Posted to this mailing list,
>or somewhere on the Web, etc.? Thanks in advance.
>
>At 08:32 PM 04/22/1999 +0300, Tero Kivinen wrote:
>>Dan Harkins writes:
>>> Is this a problem? We seem to have gotten a score (or so) interoperable
>>> implementations as its written but maybe that's just because a D-H
>>> secret hasn't been produced yet that began with 8 bits of zero. But
>>> somehow I doubt it.
>>
>>It is mainly because of the interop meetings. I remember seeing
>>different non-interoperable version because of this in one interop
>>meeting. After we didn't interoperate the other ends code was changed
>>to do what everybody else is doing, and then we had interoperable
>>versions.
>>
>>There is some of this kind of things that you can only learn by coming
>>to the interop meeting and checking out how others are doing things.
>>--
>>kivinen@iki.fi Work : +358-9-4354 3218
>>SSH Communications Security http://www.ssh.fi/
>>SSH IPSEC Toolkit http://www.ssh.fi/ipsec/
>>
References: