[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: issues from the bakeoff
At 12:54 PM 6/15/1999 -0700, Dan Harkins wrote:
> As I said, these aren't IPSec WG issues but people are using IKE to
> negotiate PCP and
>these things came up. The appropriate WG needs to deal with these.
Just a note that the IPPCP WG is no longer; they finished in December 1998.
I hope the mailing list is still active, but I cannot for the life of me
find the address of the list.
> From adm Tue Dec 22 10:16:41 1998
>Received: by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) id KAA29466
> for ietf-123-outbound.10@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 10:15:02
> -0500 (EST)
>Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US (localhost [127.0.0.1])
> by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA29411
> for <all-ietf>; Tue, 22 Dec 1998 10:14:01 -0500 (EST)
>Message-Id: <199812221514.KAA29411@ietf.org>
>To: IETF-Announce: ;
>Subject: WG Action: IP Payload Compression Protocol (ippcp) to
> conclude
>From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
>Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1998 10:14:01 -0500
>Sender: scoya@ns.cnri.reston.va.us
>
>
>The IP Payload Compression Protocol (ippcp) Working Group in the
>Internet Area of the IETF has concluded.
>
>The IESG contact persons are Thomas Narten and Jeff Burgan.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
References: