[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: issues from the bakeoff

To: itojun@iijlab.net
Subject: Re: issues from the bakeoff
From: Avram Shacham <shacham@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 22:04:09 -0700
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, ippcp@external.cisco.com
In-Reply-To: <24769.929507448@coconut.itojun.org>
References: <shacham's message of Tue, 15 Jun 1999 21:24:43 MST. <199906160426.VAA23944@honeybee.cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

At 01:30 PM 6/16/99 +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:

>  I just would like to know how we should update RFC2367 for IPComp.

>> If the API doesn't fit the protocols, shouldn't the API be adjusted?
>
>	Yes of course, but the question is, what kind of changes are necessary.
>	PFKEY is used for both manual key setups (from userland program to
>	manipulate manual keys) and autoconfigured keys (from IKE daemons).
>	I've described my quickhack above.

Rereading your previous message, the method described seems 
adequate-enough to define the CPI. 

avram

References:

Re: issues from the bakeoff

From: itojun@iijlab.net

Prev by Date: Re: issues from the bakeoff
Next by Date: Re: Comments about draft-ietf-ipsec-ike-01.txt
Prev by thread: Re: issues from the bakeoff
Next by thread: Re: issues from the bakeoff
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread