[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dangling SA Summary (final comments???)
Hi Tim,
> Tim Jenkins wrote:
>
<trimmed...>
> Also, obviously, I'm going to have to update the re-keying document to
> reflect the fact that systems are free to have dangling phase 2 SAs.
> However, I must insist that implementations are also free to have
> multiple phase 1 SAs with peers so that they can choose not to have
> dangling phase 2 SAs.
I must be missing something here - I am under the impression that
implementations have *always* been free to have multiple phase 1 SAs
with peers. Am I misunderstanding your post?
Scott
References: