[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: linux-ipsec: VS: IP tunnel over a NAT (IP masq) possible ?

To: "John D. Hardin" <jhardin@wolfenet.com>
Subject: Re: linux-ipsec: VS: IP tunnel over a NAT (IP masq) possible ?
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1999 11:34:48 -0400
Cc: O.Schnapauff@tu-bs.de, Pekka Turunen <pekka.turunen@netseal.com>, otel@ce.chalmers.se, linux-ipsec@clinet.fi, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, firewall-wizards@nfr.net
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.990720075946.30616E-100000@gypsy.rubyriver.com>, "Joh
n D. Hardin" writes:
> On Tue, 20 Jul 1999 O.Schnapauff@tu-bs.de wrote:
> 
> > As John already pointed out he is working on NAT for IPSec traffic
> 
> NB- I think I've taken IPSec masquerade about as far as it can be
> taken without attempting to communicate with the endpoint gateways or
> act as an intelligent proxy and participate in any of the encryption.

For a different approach to firewalls and IPsec, see 
http://www.research.att.com/~smb/papers/distfw.ps or 
http://www.research.att.com/~smb/papers/distfw.pdf.

Prev by Date: Re: linux-ipsec: VS: IP tunnel over a NAT (IP masq) possible ?
Next by Date: Re: More on a second IPSec algorithm
Prev by thread: Re: linux-ipsec: VS: IP tunnel over a NAT (IP masq) possible ?
Next by thread: Re: VS: IP tunnel over a NAT (IP masq) possible ?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread