[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Retransmits in traffic count?

To: Tim Jenkins <tjenkins@TimeStep.com>
Subject: Re: Retransmits in traffic count?
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@network-alchemy.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 1999 10:57:16 -0700
cc: Dan McDonald <danmcd@Eng.Sun.Com>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 05 Aug 1999 08:44:32 EDT." <319A1C5F94C8D11192DE00805FBBADDFC993A6@exchange>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

  I thought that we were doing away with traffic-based lifetime for
the IKE SA? That was suggested by Kivinen about 2 months ago. It sounded
reasonable to me and no one complained. I was going to replace the 
traffic-based lifetime by "negotiations".

  Dan.

On Thu, 05 Aug 1999 08:44:32 EDT you wrote
> Let me start again.
> 
> Should the traffic used in re-transmitting packets used in phase 1 SAs while
> negotiating anything be counted against the traffic-based lifetime of the
> SA?
>

References:

RE: Retransmits in traffic count?

From: Tim Jenkins <tjenkins@TimeStep.com>

Prev by Date: Re: PKIX vs draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-req-02.txt
Next by Date: RE: Retransmits in traffic count?
Prev by thread: Re: Retransmits in traffic count?
Next by thread: RE: Retransmits in traffic count?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread