[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Weak authentication in Xauth and IKE, CMC token enroll

To: "'ipsec@lists.tislabs.com'" <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
Subject: RE: Weak authentication in Xauth and IKE, CMC token enroll
From: Lisa Wilkinson <lisa@baltimore.ie>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 1999 12:35:51 +0100
Organization: Baltimore Technologies
Reply-To: "lisa@baltimore.ie" <lisa@baltimore.ie>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Just joined the list after a brief absence.
Slainte,

I wanted to raise the question of certificate managment, but I can see this 
discussion is undeway (Welcome to the war!)

At the last bakeoff I (Baltimore) found the following -

Of the 24 vendors we interoperated with (succesful IKE with certs) -

CEP - 4
CRS -2 (probably more but we didnt support it at the time)
Manual/LDAP retrieval - everyone else

What is IPSec going to mandate for an enrollment/management protocol? Is it 
going to be CMC (backed by Cisco, M/Soft and Verisign) using PKCS formats 
or CMP (backed by Entrust)?

We are supporting both (not by choice I might add).  The question is are 
you......


Lisa

Prev by Date: RE: inconsistencies in IKE specs
Next by Date: Re: inconsistencies in IKE specs
Prev by thread: RE: Weak authentication in Xauth and IKE, CMC token enroll
Next by thread: inconsistencies in IKE specs
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread