[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Racing QM Initiator's

To: Ben McCann <bmccann@indusriver.com>
Subject: Re: Racing QM Initiator's
From: Radha Gowda <rxg@openroute.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 17:44:21 -0400
CC: "ipsec@lists.tislabs.com" <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
References: <3804DAB3.6A8B3529@indusriver.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

> 3. One SG aborts and becomes responder. How do you know which should
> abort? The SG with the lowest IP address?

Ben,  we also experienced the same problem.  Not just in phase2, but in phase1

as well.   Just to get things going, we decided to let the one with the higher

IP address be the initiator.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Racing QM Initiator's

From: Jan Vilhuber <vilhuber@cisco.com>

References:

Racing QM Initiator's

From: Ben McCann <bmccann@indusriver.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Racing QM Initiator's
Next by Date: Re: Racing QM Initiator's
Prev by thread: Racing QM Initiator's
Next by thread: Re: Racing QM Initiator's
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread