[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Racing QM Initiator's
> But aren't these two messages going out with different message IDs
> generated randomly by each Phase II initiator? If so, why is there
> a problem ? This will result in two IPSec SAs where one would have
> been sufficient but I don't view that as catastrophic.
>
> What am I missing?
>
> vipul
Nothing, they do have separate message ID's but our implementation
is getting confused about being a QM responder and initiator on
separate QM exchanges at the same time. I'll just have to fix it...
I just wanted to verify that the expected behavior is that you
must be able to support multiple QM exchanges simultaneously.
Feedback from the list has made that abundantly clear....
-Ben McCann
--
Ben McCann Indus River Networks
31 Nagog Park
Acton, MA, 01720
email: bmccann@indusriver.com web: www.indusriver.com
phone: (978) 266-8140 fax: (978) 266-8111
References: