[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Racing QM Initiator's

To: Radha Gowda <rxg@openroute.com>
Subject: Re: Racing QM Initiator's
From: Kanta Matsuura <kanta@hideki.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 11:38:14 +0900
Cc: Jan Vilhuber <vilhuber@cisco.com>, Ben McCann <bmccann@indusriver.com>, "ipsec@lists.tislabs.com" <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <38051E0D.672C4058@openroute.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

I'd also like to point out that
Denial-of-Service attackers might abuse
 the cost of Diffie-Hellman calculation
 and public-key operations.
(Please have a look at
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-matsuura-sign-mode-01.txt
)

Radha Gowda <rxg@openroute.com> wrote:
>>> To the list at large:
>>>
>>> Why can't we put verbiage like this into the RFC? Is there some reason 
this
>>> is a bad thing to do?
>>
>>I also would like to point out to the list that Diffie-Hellman calculation 
does
>>not
>>come cheap for some of us (atleast for now).

--^^--
Kanta

References:

Re: Racing QM Initiator's

From: Radha Gowda <rxg@openroute.com>

Prev by Date: request
Next by Date: RE: Racing QM Initiator's
Prev by thread: Re: Racing QM Initiator's
Next by thread: Re: Racing QM Initiator's
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread