[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: request
What is means is this:
The standard known as ISAKMP/Oakley is now known as IKE
The standard known as IKE does not specifically exactly conform to the
standard known as ISAKMP/Oakley
Manufacturers have adopted IKE in order to satisfy customer needs rather
than try to comply with the full ISAKMP/Oakley standard
You will hear IKE and ISAKMP/Oakley used interchangeably
IKE and ISAKMP/Oakley are not the same standard as viewed from the RFC,
IKE is a subset of the original standard that for all intents and
purposes is the same thing in practical applications.
Scott Davidson
Central US Systems Engineer
NOKIA IPRG US Sales - Dallas
214.632.6191
scott.davidson@iprg.nokia.com
www.nokia.com
support.iprg.nokia.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
[mailto:owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com]On Behalf Of jerome@psti.com
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 1999 12:42 PM
To: scott.davidson@iprg.nokia.com
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: request
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999 at 11:52:08AM -0400, Scott Davidson wrote:
> Internet Key Exchange
> The Internet Key Exchange or IKE that define how to exchange security
> keys for authentication and how to negotiate the parameters of
> individual virtual private networks. IKE was originally known as
> ISAKMP/Oakley and is an Internet Protocol Security standard.
does this mean that ISAKMP/Oakley are officially obsoleted by IKE ?
The following quote seems to present it more as a subset.
" This does not implement the entire Oakley protocol, but only a subset
necessary to satisfy its goals. It does not claim conformance or
compliance with the entire Oakley protocol nor is it dependant in any
way on the Oakley protocol. " -- rfc2409.2 about IKE
smime.p7s
Follow-Ups:
- Re: request
- From: "Derrell D. Piper" <ddp@network-alchemy.com>
References: