[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments on CRACK

To: Stephane Beaulieu <sbeaulieu@TimeStep.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on CRACK
From: Moshe Litvin <moshe@checkpoint.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 18:36:08 +0200
CC: Dan Harkins <dharkins@network-alchemy.com>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, ietf-ipsra@vpnc.org
References: <319A1C5F94C8D11192DE00805FBBADDFEC97E6@exchange>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Stephane Beaulieu wrote:

<snip>

>   However, I would like to hear everyone else's
> opinion on this.  Should the use of pre-shared keys be restricted in XAUTH
> (or whatever other protocol) because it encourages the use of weak
> pre-shared keys?
>
> If there is concensus, pre-shared keys can be removed from XAUTH.  I don't
> think that we have concensus at this point.

Maybe we can reach a consensus by forbidding group pre-shared keys?

Moshe

begin:vcard 
n:Litvin;Moshe
tel;fax:+972 3 5759256
tel;work:+972 3 7534601
x-mozilla-html:TRUE
org:Check Point Software Technologies Ltd.
adr:;;;;;;
version:2.1
email;internet:moshe@CheckPoint.com
fn:Moshe Litvin
end:vcard

References:

RE: Comments on CRACK

From: Stephane Beaulieu <sbeaulieu@TimeStep.com>

Prev by Date: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-pki-req-03.txt
Next by Date: Re: CRACK
Prev by thread: RE: Comments on CRACK
Next by thread: Re: Comments on CRACK
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread