[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Phase 1 Re-keying Implementation Identification

To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: Phase 1 Re-keying Implementation Identification
From: Ben McCann <bmccann@indusriver.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 08:58:18 -0500
CC: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
References: <4.2.1.19991118181403.00c4cc20@mail.vpnc.org>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Paul Hoffman wrote:

> If you want continuous channel support to be TimeStep-only, it is 
> appropriate to use the Vendor ID payload. Otherwise, some other mechanism 
> for both sides to be sure that the other side is using it must be developed.

Is ISAKMP Mode Config (draft-ietf-ipsec-isakmp-mode-config-05.txt) an
appropriate mechanism to negotiate optional features such as Continuous
Mode if we conclude that continuous mode is needed?

-Ben McCann

-- 
Ben McCann                              Indus River Networks
                                        31 Nagog Park
                                        Acton, MA, 01720
email: bmccann@indusriver.com           web: www.indusriver.com 
phone: (978) 266-8140                   fax: (978) 266-8111

References:

RE: Phase 1 Re-keying Implementation Identification

From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>

Prev by Date: Re: [Raven] FBI secret police
Next by Date: Re: Phase 1 Re-keying Implementation Identification
Prev by thread: RE: Phase 1 Re-keying Implementation Identification
Next by thread: RE: Phase 1 Re-keying Implementation Identification
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread