[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ID payload on phase 2.

To: francisco_corella@hp.com
Subject: Re: ID payload on phase 2.
From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@network-alchemy.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 09:10:17 -0800
cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, sakane@ydc.co.jp
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Dec 1999 07:16:31 PST." <H00013960da214d7@MHS>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

  Why can't it contain 10.10/24/tcp/0? Look at the figure and accompanying
text in 4.6.2 of RFC2407. What do you think the protocol and port fields
are for? 

  Dan.

On Wed, 08 Dec 1999 07:16:31 PST you wrote
>      I'm confused.  Are you saying that the ID payload contains a selector 
>      such as 10.10.10/24/tcp/0?
>      
>      According to the DOI RFC (RFC 2407), Section 4.6.2, the ID payload may 
>      contain verious kinds of addresses and names, but not selectors.  It 
>      could contain 10.10.10/24 but not 10.10.10/24/tcp/0.
>      
>      Francisco

Follow-Ups:

Re: ID payload on phase 2.

From: francisco_corella@hp.com

References:

Re: ID payload on phase 2.

From: francisco_corella@hp.com

Prev by Date: RE: ID payload on phase 2.
Next by Date: Re: Heartbeats (was RE: keepalives)
Prev by thread: Re: ID payload on phase 2.
Next by thread: Re: ID payload on phase 2.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread