In-Reply-To: Message from "Mason, Shane" <smason@blockade.com> of "Tue, 21 Dec 1999 13:19:07 EST." <60A30A0BD275D211B8F1006097E4728523BD6A@mailgw.blockade.com>
> So non-repudiability and repudiability are defined as proof or lack of proof
> _to_be_taken_to_a_third_party_for_adjudication_? They have no meaning
> outside of a three+ party scenario?
Cryptography isn't needed in a <3 party scenario.
- Bill