[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: signture mode and non-repudiation



???

>> Cryptography isn't needed in a <3 party scenario.

Please explain this one.


-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Sommerfeld [mailto:sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us]
Sent: December 21, 1999 1:53 PM
To: Mason, Shane
Cc: 'Dan Harkins'; 'Hugo Krawczyk'; Stephen Kent;
francisco_corella@hp.com; ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: signture mode and non-repudiation 


> So non-repudiability and repudiability are defined as proof or lack of
proof
> _to_be_taken_to_a_third_party_for_adjudication_?  They have no meaning
> outside of a three+ party scenario?

Cryptography isn't needed in a <3 party scenario.

					- Bill