[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: signture mode and non-repudiation

To: Jean Triquet <Jean.Triquet@PWGSC.GC.CA>
Subject: Re: signture mode and non-repudiation
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 17:24:47 -0500
cc: "'Bill Sommerfeld'" <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>, "'ipsec@lists.tislabs.com'" <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from Jean Triquet <Jean.Triquet@PWGSC.GC.CA> of "Tue, 21 Dec 1999 17:04:16 EST." <C19E08D60236D311A29208002BC3F255186BCA@mb-ncr-010.ncr.pwgsc.gc.ca>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

> >> Cryptography isn't needed in a <3 party scenario.
> 
> Please explain this one.

I'm including attackers/adversaries in the count of parties.

						- Bill

Prev by Date: RE: signture mode and non-repudiation
Next by Date: Workshop CA's.....
Prev by thread: RE: signture mode and non-repudiation
Next by thread: RE: signture mode and non-repudiation
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread