[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: Very quick, very basic
oops, excellent observation:) Thank you. I was assuming TCP. thnx
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 12:55:00 PM, you wrote:
SB> Well assuming that you are sending TCP (and not UDP or ICMP) you are
SB> correct...
SB> Bill
SB> ______________________________________________
SB> Bill Strahm Programming today is a race between
SB> bill.strahm@ software engineers striving to build
SB> intel.com bigger and better idiot-proof programs,
SB> (503) 264-4632 and the Universe trying to produce
SB> bigger and better idiots. So far, the
SB> Universe is winning.--Rich Cook
SB> I am not speaking for Intel. And Intel rarely speaks for me
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Tiller [mailto:jtiller@lucent.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 8:30 AM
>> To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
>> Subject: Very quick, very basic
>>
>>
>> Please excuse the silliness.
>>
>> The next header field in ESP contains an 8-bit value to represent the
>> header contained within the encrypted payload.
>> So, this is how I read it, please verify the
>> following for me:
>>
>> ESP used in tunnel mode -next header = 4 for IP-in-IP
>> ESP used in transport mode -next header = 6 for TCP.
>>
>> True or false? Or is it reversed?
>>
>> A very grateful thank you in advance.
>>
>> -jim
>>
>>
>>
>>
References: