[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bruce Schneier on IPsec

To: rgm-sec@htt-consult.com
Subject: Re: Bruce Schneier on IPsec
From: Phil Karn <karn@ka9q.ampr.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 17:03:40 -0800
CC: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-reply-to: <4.2.0.58.20000201093303.00d1dcb0@homebase.htt-consult.com>(message from Robert Moskowitz on Tue, 01 Feb 2000 09:52:41 -0500)
References: <Message from Phil Karn <karn@ka9q.ampr.org><200002010849.AAA26330@homer.ka9q.ampr.org> <4.2.0.58.20000201093303.00d1dcb0@homebase.htt-consult.com>
Reply-to: karn@qualcomm.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

>it took a while to admit that and develop a NULL encrypt mode for ESP.  The 
>ONLY arguements for AH in v4 space were political/administrative.  I will 
>drop this line of reason at this point before I dig a fight line :)

I point out that those political/administrative arguments were made
largely obsolete two weeks ago when the US crypto export rules were
finally relaxed.  As I understand it, US export controls were the
primary motivation both for AH (or an authentication-only ESP) and
for single-key DES.

Phil

References:

Re: Bruce Schneier on IPsec

From: Phil Karn <karn@ka9q.ampr.org>

Re: Bruce Schneier on IPsec

From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>

Prev by Date: Notifications for failure in Config mode
Next by Date: Re: Notifications for failure in Config mode
Prev by thread: Re: Bruce Schneier on IPsec
Next by thread: Re: Bruce Schneier on IPsec
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread