[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Commit Bit and SPI?
Add one 'vote' for
- reply with one Notify only. SPIs not required, if there don't fail,
support people who already put them there but processing is not required.
- to keep things simple, reflect commit bit. No optional reflecting and
what that might mean.
Bye.
Greg Carter
Entrust Technologies - http://www.entrust.com
http://www.ford-trucks.com/articles/buildup/dana60.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Harkins [mailto:dharkins@network-alchemy.com]
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2000 1:13 PM
To: Will Fiveash
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: Commit Bit and SPI?
Will,
Something has to be said to clear this up, yes. But it's a decision of
the WG. Do we send a notify for each SA pair containing the responder's
SPI(s) or do we send a single notify with no SPIs? Can we not reflect the
commit bit and if so what does that mean? Who can set the commit bit and
where should that be allowed and prohibited? If we can get some consensus
on this matter it'll go in the document but a unilateral decision by me
will only result in conflict.
Follow-Ups: