[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Proposal for new DH Groups 6, 7, and 8
The DH well-known primes are listed in Appendix E of RFC 2412 (Oakley), not
RFC 2409 (IKE).
I don't think they should be going to Dan to include in the IKE doc, they
should be added to
2412 with the rest.
That is, once people have agreed as to what group numbers they will be
assigned. :-)
:Later
-Joe
Entrust Technologies
"We Bring Trust to e-Business"(tm)
Entrust Toolkit Development
Phone:(613) 248-3208
Fax: (613) 247-3450
Email: joe.maclellan@entrust.com
http://www.entrust.com
Register now for Entrust SecureSummit 2000
http://www.securesummit.com
May 1-4, 2000, Hyatt Regency at Reunion, Dallas, TX
> ----------
> From: Tero Kivinen[SMTP:kivinen@ssh.fi]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 10:04 AM
> To: wprice@cyphers.net
> Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: Re: Proposal for new DH Groups 6, 7, and 8
>
> Will Price writes:
> > So, let's move this forward. Do you want to write those primes up as a
> > draft or can Dan include them in the next IKE-01 draft?
>
> I already sent the 2048 bit prime to Dan earlier (few months ago), but
> I don't know if he is going to include it to the IKE 01 draft. I think
> it would be better to keep all those primes together, i.e include them
> to the IKE draft. I can also make it separate draft if we cannot put
> them in to the IKE draft.
> --
> kivinen@iki.fi Work : +358-9-4354 3218
> SSH Communications Security http://www.ssh.fi/
> SSH IPSEC Toolkit http://www.ssh.fi/ipsec/
>
Follow-Ups: