[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Heartbeats draft available

To: akrywani@newbridge.com
Subject: Re: Heartbeats draft available
From: "Scott G. Kelly" <skelly@redcreek.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2000 15:48:19 -0800
CC: "'Ricky Charlet'" <rcharlet@redcreek.com>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Organization: RedCreek Communications
References: <003601bf937e$bf080740$1e0101c8@ANDREWK2.TIMESTEP>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

<substantially trimmed...>

Andrew Krywaniuk wrote:
> 
> Anyway, I really don't think it matters whether we do heartbeats in phase 1
> or phase 2. That wasn't a requirement of my protocol. On the other hand,
> providing a negotiation protocol was a definite requirement.

Whether "heartbeats" are sent in a phase 1 or phase 2 SA, they are
essentially a feature of the SA. Features of SAs are currently
configured (and negotiated) using SA attributes. Why would these be any
different?

Scott

Follow-Ups:

Re: Heartbeats draft available

From: Tero Kivinen <kivinen@ssh.fi>

References:

RE: Heartbeats draft available

From: "Andrew Krywaniuk" <akrywani@newbridge.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Heartbeats draft available
Next by Date: Re: Announcing X-Bone VPN/overlay software release
Prev by thread: RE: Heartbeats draft available
Next by thread: Re: Heartbeats draft available
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread