[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Heartbeats draft (fwd)

To: IP Security List <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
Subject: RE: Heartbeats draft (fwd)
From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 11:36:30 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10003291413280.29653-100000@zipper.cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, CHINNA N.R. PELLACURU wrote:
> I think, everybody is aware of atleast one implementation that elegantly
> provides high availability, in the current framework of IKE and IPSec. So,
> I feel that high availability can be acheived in an efficient way if we do
> it in an implementation specific way.

Uh, no, not everybody is aware of such an implementation.  Please be more
specific instead of vaguely alluding to it.  Explanations of exactly how it
is done would also be welcome.

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@spsystems.net

Follow-Ups:

RE: Heartbeats draft (fwd)

From: "CHINNA N.R. PELLACURU" <pcn@cisco.com>

References:

RE: Heartbeats draft (fwd)

From: "CHINNA N.R. PELLACURU" <pcn@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Looking for performance data - SHA1
Next by Date: Re: Looking for performance data - SHA1
Next by thread: Q:Regarding AH & ESP
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread