[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPsec or IPSec?

To: Dan Harkins <dharkins@network-alchemy.com>
Subject: Re: IPsec or IPSec?
From: "CHINNA N.R. PELLACURU" <pcn@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2000 11:53:11 -0700 (PDT)
cc: "Shriver, John" <john.shriver@intel.com>, "'Niloo Soleimani'" <niloo@cisco.com>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, smilley@cisco.com
In-Reply-To: <200005041929.MAA01170@potassium.network-alchemy.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

The tech people feel that everything is done. Marketing has taken over!

-chinna

On Thu, 4 May 2000, Dan Harkins wrote:

>   IPSec or IPsec? This must, surely, mean that the working group is over.
> 
>   Dan.
> 
> On Thu, 04 May 2000 11:56:41 PDT you wrote
> > IPsec, according to Stephen Kent.  It will be fixed in the next release of
> > the "IPSec DOI Textual Conventions MIB".
> > 
> 

chinna narasimha reddy pellacuru
s/w engineer

"I have no love of technology for technology's sake, Only solutions for
customers." John Chambers

References:

Re: IPsec or IPSec?

From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@network-alchemy.com>

Prev by Date: Re: IPsec or IPSec?
Next by Date: Re: IPsec or IPSec?
Prev by thread: Re: IPsec or IPSec?
Next by thread: RE: IPsec or IPSec?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread