[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DES (was: Interoperability)

To: rgm-sec@htt-consult.com
Subject: RE: DES (was: Interoperability)
From: Paul Koning <pkoning@xedia.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 12:54:25 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: David_Mason@nai.com, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
References: <447A3F40A07FD211BA2700A0C99D759B789093@md-exchange1.nai.com><4.3.2.7.2.20000606125037.046c7430@homebase.htt-consult.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com> writes:

 Robert> At 09:44 AM 6/6/2000 -0700, Mason, David wrote:
 >> With the talk of moving AH to historical perhaps it's a good time
 >> to suggest moving DES and Group 1 to historical as well!

 Robert> SAAG 'voting' has DES to historical waiting on AES selection.

Why?

The "insecure" status of DES is unrelated to the AES process or
schedule. 

	  paul

Follow-Ups:

RE: DES (was: Interoperability)

From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>

References:

RE: Interoperability (was: Death to AH?)

From: "Mason, David" <David_Mason@nai.com>

RE: Interoperability (was: Death to AH?)

From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Interoperability (was: Death to AH?)
Next by Date: RE: DES (was: Interoperability)
Prev by thread: RE: Interoperability (was: Death to AH?)
Next by thread: RE: DES (was: Interoperability)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread