[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: phase 2 and ports

To: "Scott G. Kelly" <skelly@redcreek.com>
Subject: Re: phase 2 and ports
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 19:46:59 -0400
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <3958D4CD.D139BD15@redcreek.com>
References: <200006261921.MAA02694@potassium.network-alchemy.com><v04220800b57e67d5875a@[128.33.238.85]> <3958D4CD.D139BD15@redcreek.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Scott,

I agree that we need appropriate payload types for IKE.  The IPSP 
work will not fix that problem.  Sorry to have not been clear in my 
reply.

Steve

References:

Re: phase 2 and ports

From: Dan Harkins <dharkins@cips.nokia.com>

Re: phase 2 and ports

From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

Re: phase 2 and ports

From: "Scott G. Kelly" <skelly@redcreek.com>

Prev by Date: Re: phase 2 and ports
Next by Date: Re: phase 2 and ports
Prev by thread: Re: phase 2 and ports
Next by thread: Re: phase 2 and ports
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread