[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New draft-vlado-keep-alive-02
There are now two drafts about how to do heartbeats/keepalives with
IPsec. Back in Adelaide, we were directed by our WG chair (who was directed
by the AD's) to build a compelling case for the need for keepalives before
the working group would take it up.
I think that Vlado's problem description shows one huge motivation why
we should care about this, namely as an enabler for fault recovery. The
IPSRA group has also settled on a requirement that gateways must be able to
detect the disaperance of clients as an enabler to accounting. In my
estimation, these two motivations are each sufficient on their own to move
forward with a heartbeat/keepalive work. (It remains to debate how best to
do this) But I just wanted to state my opinion that I think this is valid
working group effort. Any one have other thoughts here????
----- Original Message -----
From: Vlado Zafirov <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 8:03 AM
Subject: New draft-vlado-keep-alive-02
> This is my new version of the draft. I hope I addressed most of the
> issues of the previous one.
> Vlado Zafirov
> RADWare, INC
> Technical Support Engineer
> Tel: (202) 625-1505
> Fax: (202) 625-1506
> Confidentiality Note: This e-mail, and any attachment to it, contains
> privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the
> individual(s) or entity
> named in the e-mail. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
> recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering it to the
> intended recipient, you are
> hereby notified that reading it is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this e-mail in error, please immediately return it to the
> sender and delete it from your system.
> Thank you.