[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Assigned Numbers for AES

To: IP Security List <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: Assigned Numbers for AES
From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:24:56 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <200010031928.MAA20369@gallium.network-alchemy.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

On Tue, 3 Oct 2000, Derrell D. Piper wrote:
> Quite a few vendors are already using the value (5) for AH with RIPEMD-160.

That's their mistake, a clear violation of the standard, since 5 is not in
the private-use part of the number space. 

                                                          Henry Spencer
                                                       henry@spsystems.net

References:

Re: Assigned Numbers for AES

From: "Derrell D. Piper" <ddp@cips.nokia.COM>

Prev by Date: Re: [ipsec] IPSec implementations possible on handheld OS?
Next by Date: Re: Assigned Numbers for AES
Prev by thread: Re: Assigned Numbers for AES
Next by thread: RE: Assigned Numbers for AES
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread