[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Simplifying IKE (was RE: Reliable delete notifies)

To: IP Security List <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>, Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Subject: Re: Simplifying IKE (was RE: Reliable delete notifies)
From: "Valery Smyslov" <svan@trustworks.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 09:46:27 +0400
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSI.3.91.1001012190352.13141T-100000@spsystems.net>
Organization: TWS
References: <4.3.1.0.20001012153443.00d62e90@brisco.passedge.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

On 12 Oct 00, at 19:06, Henry Spencer wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Mark Baugher wrote:
> > >Realistically, anyone designing a new key-management protocol would have
> > >to be out of his mind to base it on ISAKMP. 
> > 
> > Why?
> 
> Because it's grossly complex, badly designed, and poorly documented.
> It doesn't do enough for you to be worth the trouble.

Please, suggest an alternative.

>                                                           Henry Spencer
>                                                        henry@spsystems.net

Regards,
Valery Smyslov.

Follow-Ups:

Re: Simplifying IKE (was RE: Reliable delete notifies)

From: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@conscoop.ottawa.on.ca>

References:

Re: Simplifying IKE (was RE: Reliable delete notifies)

From: Mark Baugher <mbaugher@passedge.com>

Re: Simplifying IKE (was RE: Reliable delete notifies)

From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>

Prev by Date: Help : Mobile IPsec
Next by Date: Re: Simplifying IKE (was RE: Reliable delete notifies)
Prev by thread: Re: Simplifying IKE (was RE: Reliable delete notifies)
Next by thread: Re: Simplifying IKE (was RE: Reliable delete notifies)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread