[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Getting focus for son-of-IKE



Stephen Kent wrote:
> 
> Paul,
> 
> I generally like your analysis for IKE, but I would also like to
> suggest that there may be a few "added functions" that should be on
> the list.  For example, we stripped out several negotiation features
> for phase II which had been supported in the SPD, e.g., port ranges
> or lists vs. individual port numbers.  I'd like to see these added
> back.
> 
> Steve

I agree with Steve. In general, I would like to see a more comprehensive
selector specification mechanism in IKE. 

Scott


Follow-Ups: References: