[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Getting focus for son-of-IKE
Stephen Kent wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> I generally like your analysis for IKE, but I would also like to
> suggest that there may be a few "added functions" that should be on
> the list. For example, we stripped out several negotiation features
> for phase II which had been supported in the SPD, e.g., port ranges
> or lists vs. individual port numbers. I'd like to see these added
> back.
>
> Steve
I agree with Steve. In general, I would like to see a more comprehensive
selector specification mechanism in IKE.
Scott
Follow-Ups:
References: