[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NAT and IPsec

To: "Bernard Aboba" <bernarda@Exchange.Microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: NAT and IPsec
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 16:01:53 -0400
Cc: <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <766EFCAA12CB514CAC64D8C440F5A50E108579@DF-SCRAPPY.platinum.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <766EFCAA12CB514CAC64D8C440F5A50E108579@DF-SCRAPPY.platinum.corp.microsoft.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Bernard,

You win the prize for the ugliest MIME-formatted message I have ever received!

  (No comment on the content.)

Was there some good reason to send a multi-part message for this exchange?

Steve

References:

RE: NAT and IPsec

From: "Bernard Aboba" <bernarda@Exchange.Microsoft.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Identity Type
Next by Date: Re: Safety of pre-shared keys? (Re: Reliable delete notifies)
Prev by thread: RE: NAT and IPsec
Next by thread: Re: NAT and IPsec
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread