[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RFC 2401 section 5.2.1

To: "'itojun@iijlab.net'" <itojun@iijlab.net>, Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Subject: RE: RFC 2401 section 5.2.1
From: Richard Draves <richdr@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 10:40:12 -0800
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, Francis Dupont <Francis.Dupont@enst-bretagne.fr>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

> >On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, Richard Draves wrote:
> >> a) Do you agree that Mobile IPv6's requirement that AH be 
> used and not ESP
> >> is too restrictive?
> >Strongly agree.  We'd like to see AH die entirely, and hence 
> are opposed
> >to having any other standard demand its continued survival.
> 
> 	(again this holy war on AH)

I'm not trying to rule out AH - that's a different argument and I don't know
enough to have a strong opinion. I just want the Mobile IPv6 spec to have
the flexibility to allow either AH or ESP.

Thanks,
Rich

Prev by Date: Re: RFC 2401 section 5.2.1
Next by Date: Hi
Prev by thread: RE: RFC 2401 section 5.2.1
Next by thread: Re: RFC 2401 section 5.2.1
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread