[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: IPSEC Agenda Topics
As for the SNMP MIB, there have been next to no comments (one) on the
versions submitted. I have one change to make, and that is to make all table
indices not accessible. I didn't get this submitted before the cut-off, so
they'll be submitted in late December or in the new year.
Anyway, the lack of response to the last versions suggests that
a) Everyone thinks they're perfect, (yeah, right) or
b) No one cares, or
c) Some other answer.
In any case, no presentation is warranted due to the lack of activity.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2000 4:45 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: IPSEC Agenda Topics
> These are the only people who have sent me e-mail requesting time for
> the San Diego IPSEC working group meeting.
> Please contact me ASAP if you have some additional topics you
> would like
> to propose and lead for the working group. (Notably missing from the
> list are SNMP MIB and Son-of-IKE topics...)
> - Ted
> Steve Kent 15-20 minutes extensions to IPSEC to accomodate
> higher speed nets, including a new
> AES-based mode
> Markus Stenberg <firstname.lastname@example.org> 5-10 minutes
> stenberg-ipsec-nat-traversal-01.. say 5min?
> Ari Huttunen 5-10 minutes draft-huttunen-ipsec-esp-in-udp-00.txt
> Jayant <email@example.com> 5-10 minutes