[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re[2]: Proposal in IKE and IP packet format

To: sakane@ydc.co.jp
Subject: Re[2]: Proposal in IKE and IP packet format
From: Yutaka SAKAI <sakai@e3.jrc.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:08:28 +0900
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <20001214144427X.sakane@ydc.co.jp>
References: <20001214120513.6899.SAKAI@e3.jrc.co.jp> <20001214144427X.sakane@ydc.co.jp>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

If I wasn't understandable, 
I wouldn't be notifiable.
If I couldn't ever be courageous, 
I wouldn't deserve to be notifiable.
  as if Raymond Chandler ;-)

regards,
Yutaka

"Shoichi 'Ne' Sakane" wrote:
> > I feel that there are some "cut and paste" misses 
> > in "3rd proposal" column of table C.
> > Is this feeling correct?
> 
> Sorry, I wrote some wrong lines.
> But you can get my aim, can't you ?

References:

Re: Proposal in IKE and IP packet format

From: Yutaka SAKAI <sakai@e3.jrc.co.jp>

Re: Proposal in IKE and IP packet format

From: "Shoichi 'Ne' Sakane" <sakane@ydc.co.jp>

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal in IKE and IP packet format
Next by Date: Re: Other IKE implementations with GSSAPI support?
Prev by thread: Re: Proposal in IKE and IP packet format
Next by thread: IKE attributes consistency.
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread