[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPSec vs. SSL

To: "Tim Lee" <dlee2@gl.umbc.edu>
Subject: Re: IPSec vs. SSL
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@mit.edu>
Date: 18 Dec 2000 14:40:29 -0500
Cc: <ipsec@lists.tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: "Tim Lee"'s message of "Sat, 16 Dec 2000 20:30:58 -0500"
References: <000801c067c9$033b9de0$0a01a8c0@hwrd1.md.home.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

"Tim Lee" <dlee2@gl.umbc.edu> writes:

> Are there any situations where it is useful to have IPSec in addition to =

Yes, if you have an application-level gateway or proxy..  You can
proxy the SSL but you cannot proxy IPSec end-to-end.

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available

References:

Re: IPSec vs. SSL

From: "Tim Lee" <dlee2@gl.umbc.edu>

Prev by Date: MODP groups draft concern
Next by Date: Re: IPSec vs. SSL
Prev by thread: Re: IPSec vs. SSL
Next by thread: Re: IPSec vs. SSL
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread