[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: exchange type 6?

To: jeff <jeff@allegrosys.com>
Subject: Re: exchange type 6?
From: Jan Vilhuber <vilhuber@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:43:02 -0800 (PST)
cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <23051C9F9BABD411A7850002B3084799090302@DELTA>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

That is most likely the transaction payload erroneously defined as number 6
by the config-mode draft (or xauth; I forget which). I believe newer versions
of that draft now define a vendor-id payload for this, retracting the earlier
use of type 6.

As far as I know type 6 exchange is not IANA assigned.

I also think that you'll find lots of vendors sending this, if they support
eariler versions of the config-mode and xauth drafts, not just cisco.

jan

On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, jeff wrote:

> Has ISAKMP exchange type #6 been defined? I've seen this 
> transmitted by a Cisco IPSec implementation.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jeff Enderwick
> 

 --
Jan Vilhuber                                            vilhuber@cisco.com
Cisco Systems, San Jose

References:

exchange type 6?

From: jeff <jeff@allegrosys.com>

Prev by Date: Re: exchange type 6?
Next by Date: Any firm plans for another Bakeoff?
Prev by thread: Re: exchange type 6?
Next by thread: Re: exchange type 6?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread