[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: exchange type 6?

To: wprice@cyphers.net, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: exchange type 6?
From: Derrell Piper <ddp@electric-loft.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 06:58:39 -0800
In-Reply-To: <3A9496D2.B6F67807@cyphers.net>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Will,

I just don't agree with allocating a reserved number to Config/XAUTH. 
XAUTH was not adopted because it has serious security problems.  We did 
think about this.  The problem is that there's been essentially no progress
on adopting a viable alternative (e.g. CRACK or Hybrid) so people continue 
to use what they've got.  However, it's our charter to provide secure 
protocols and standardizing anything less is unacceptable to some of us.

Derrell

Follow-Ups:

Re: exchange type 6?

From: Ari Huttunen <Ari.Huttunen@F-Secure.com>

Re: exchange type 6?

From: "Stephane Beaulieu" <stephane@cisco.com>

References:

Re: exchange type 6?

From: Will Price <wprice@cyphers.net>

Prev by Date: Re: exchange type 6?
Next by Date: Re: On the Use of SCTP with IPsec
Prev by thread: RE: exchange type 6?
Next by thread: Re: exchange type 6?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread