[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Internet Draft for explicit security labels in IPv6.



This sounds like it mandates the use of AH, is that correct?

Best Regards,
Joseph D. Harwood
jharwood@vesta-corp.com
www.vesta-corp.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> [mailto:owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com]On Behalf Of Kais Belgaied
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 7:18 PM
> To: ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com; ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: Internet Draft for explicit security labels in IPv6.
> 
> 
> Greetings,
> 
> IPv4 had IPSO and CIPSO for labeling of packets assuming we're operating
> within the premises of a trusted infrastructure.
> IPv6 only has the implicit labeling by having different IPsec SAs convey
> different labels.
> We think there is a need to have explicit labels in IPv6, whether or not
> IPsec is used.
> 
> Please see draft-belgaied-ipv6-lsopt-00.txt
> 
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-belgaied-ipv6-lsopt-00.txt
>     
>     
> Regards,
> Kais.
> 
> 
> 
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Harwood;Joseph;D.
FN:Joseph D. Harwood
ORG:Vesta Corporation
ADR;WORK:;(408) 838-9434;5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 320;Santa Clara;CA;95054
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:(408) 838-9434=0D=0A5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 320=0D=0ASanta Clara, =
CA 95054
URL:
URL:http://www.vesta-corp.com
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:jharwood@vesta-corp.com
REV:20001011T162328Z
END:VCARD

References: