[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SA identification

To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Subject: Re: SA identification
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@kolumbus.fi>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:43:10 +0200
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
References: <p05010401b6dfaec6aa35@[128.33.238.44]>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-icclin i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001107 Netscape6/6.0

Stephen Kent wrote:

> Some mobility problems  could be addressed if we ignored destination 
> address.
>  

Also, the configuration of manual SAs to protect v6 control signaling
traffic on e.g. an office WLAN network would be a lot easier if the 
destination
address was ignored [draft-arkko-manual-icmpv6-sas-00.txt].

Multicast is used in that case as well, but in that particular application
coordinating the multicast SPI numbers would be easier than in
the general case of internet TV viewers scattered around the globe.

Jari

Follow-Ups:

Re: SA identification

From: Markku Savela <msa@burp.tkv.asdf.org>

References:

SA identification

From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Agenda for the Minneapolis meeting
Next by Date: Re: SA identification
Prev by thread: Re: Death to AH (was Re: SA identification)
Next by thread: Re: SA identification
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread