[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SA identification
In message <p0501040ab6e11a269018@[128.33.4.39]>, Stephen Kent writes:
>At 9:15 PM +0200 3/22/01, Markku Savela wrote:
>
>As the SCTP presentation and ID shows, it is not purely a local
>matter. If we did away with the requirement to use the destination
>address as part of the SA selection process at a receiver, there
>would be no need to make this process more complex to accommodate
>SCTP requirements.
That's correct for the receiver; the sender still has to be able to
use the destination address as part of the SA lookup, and thus has to be
able to do a many-to-one mapping based on the address.
-Angelos
Follow-Ups:
References: