[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SA identification




In message <p0501040ab6e11a269018@[128.33.4.39]>, Stephen Kent writes:
 >At 9:15 PM +0200 3/22/01, Markku Savela wrote:
 >
 >As the SCTP presentation and ID shows, it is not purely a local 
 >matter. If we did away with the requirement to use the destination 
 >address as part of the SA selection process at a receiver, there 
 >would be no need to make this process more complex to accommodate 
 >SCTP requirements.

That's correct for the receiver; the sender still has to be able to
use the destination address as part of the SA lookup, and thus has to be
able to do a many-to-one mapping based on the address.
-Angelos





Follow-Ups: References: