[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SCTP and IPsec issues

To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: Re: SCTP and IPsec issues
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:06:05 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:32:00 EST." <200103281832.f2SIW0c06237@nyarlathotep.keromytis.org>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com


 >>>>> "Angelos" == Angelos D Keromytis <angelos@keromytis.org> writes:
     Angelos> but that can be done by a series of Phase 2 exchanges just as
     Angelos> easily. In any situation that involves automatic keying (e.g.,
     Angelos> "telnet -secure foo.com"), I don't see how this would buy you
     Angelos> anything, other than increased complexity.

   "ftp -secure foo.com"

] Train travel features AC outlets with no take-off restrictions|gigabit is no[
]   Michael Richardson, Solidum Systems   Oh where, oh where has|problem  with[
]     mcr@solidum.com   www.solidum.com   the little fishy gone?|PAX.port 1100[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

Follow-Ups:

Re: SCTP and IPsec issues

From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@keromytis.org>

References:

Re: SCTP and IPsec issues

From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@keromytis.org>

Prev by Date: No Subject
Next by Date: Re: don't get any encrypted packets!
Prev by thread: Re: SCTP and IPsec issues
Next by thread: Re: SCTP and IPsec issues
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread